Scot L. Eustis

698 citations
23 papers · 487 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 10
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 3
    • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis 1

Scot L. Eustis

23 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Scot L. Eustis
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Cancer Research 215
  • Chemical Health and Safety 9
  • Aging 22
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 140
  • Small Animals 47
Replace Charles D. Garner with:
Charles D. Garner United States
T B Starr United States
Masuo Tobe Japan
W.R.F. Notten Netherlands
P. Günzel Germany
Otis Lyght United States
John R. Henneman United States
Hans B. Ketelslegers Netherlands
Fred G. Bock United States
Dan D. Petersen United States
Scot L. Eustis relative to Charles D. Garner United States Charles D. Garner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Charles D. Garner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scot L. Eustis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scot L. Eustis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scot L. Eustis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scot L. Eustis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scot L. Eustis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scot L. Eustis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scot L. Eustis. The network helps show where Scot L. Eustis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scot L. Eustis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scot L. Eustis Line = papers co-authored together Scot L. Eustis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990101
2 198642
3 199435
4 199134
5 199034
6
Bromodichloromethane, a trihalomethane that produces neoplasms in rodents.
198733
7 198831
8 199630
9 199430
10 199020
11 199016
12 198914
13 198713
14 199011
15 198810
16 199110
17 19847
18 19905
19 19914
20 19942

About Scot L. Eustis

Scot L. Eustis is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (2 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (2 papers), Potato Plant Research (2 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (215 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (9 citations), Aging (22 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (140 citations) and Small Animals (47 citations). Scot L. Eustis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph K. Haseman, Ghanta N. Rao, Sondra L. Grumbein, Gary A. Boorman, June K. Dunnick, James Huff, John R. Bucher, Herman S. Lilja, Jane Ellen Simmons and Bernard Adkins. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicologic Pathology, Toxicological Sciences, Toxicology, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health and Toxicology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact