Dan D. Petersen

1.2k citations
8 papers · 882 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dan D. Petersen

8 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

Dan D. Petersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 140
  • Molecular Biology 525
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 100
  • Cancer Research 91
  • Genetics 178
Replace Agneta Blanck with:
Agneta Blanck Sweden
Lascelles E. Lyn‐Cook United States
R W BISHOP United States
George E. Swaneck United States
Kai‐Lin Lee United States
M Weinberger United States
N. IKEKAWA Japan
Yuan Cortez United States
Neville N.C. Tam United States
Dan D. Petersen relative to Agneta Blanck Sweden Agneta Blanck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Agneta Blanck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan D. Petersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan D. Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan D. Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan D. Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan D. Petersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan D. Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan D. Petersen. The network helps show where Dan D. Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan D. Petersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan D. Petersen Line = papers co-authored together Dan D. Petersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1984411
2 2013167
3 1988107
4 1989104
5 201236
6 198825
7 201019
8 201613

About Dan D. Petersen

Dan D. Petersen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Surgery, Small Animals and Speech and Hearing, having authored 8 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Animal testing and alternatives (1 paper), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (1 paper) and Noise Effects and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (140 citations), Molecular Biology (525 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (100 citations), Cancer Research (91 citations) and Genetics (178 citations). Dan D. Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D K Granner, Stephen R. Koch, Timothy P. Cripe, Teresa L. Andreone, Elmus Beale, Kazuo Sasaki, Mark A. Magnuson, Scott C. Wesselkamper, Jason C. Lambert and Nina Ching Y. Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact