Scot Hill
Impact in
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 10
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 5
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 6
- Co-authors
- John A. Sweeney (9 shared papers)Godfrey D. Pearlson (15 shared papers)Matcheri S. Keshavan (14 shared papers)Carol A. Tamminga (15 shared papers)Elliot S. Gershon (13 shared papers)James L. Reilly (5 shared papers)Jeffrey R. Bishop (8 shared papers)Brett A. Clementz (12 shared papers)
- Journals
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (3 papers)Biological Psychiatry (3 papers)Schizophrenia Research (3 papers)Translational Psychiatry (2 papers)American Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Scot Hill
16 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Biological Psychiatry 28
- Psychiatry and Mental health 138
- Pharmacy 27
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 32
- Cognitive Neuroscience 86
Countries citing papers authored by Scot Hill
This map shows the geographic impact of Scot Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scot Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scot Hill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scot Hill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scot Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scot Hill. The network helps show where Scot Hill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scot Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About Scot Hill
Scot Hill is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 18 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (138 citations), Pharmacy (27 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (32 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations). Scot Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John A. Sweeney, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Matcheri S. Keshavan, Carol A. Tamminga, Elliot S. Gershon, James L. Reilly, Jeffrey R. Bishop, Brett A. Clementz, Richard S.E. Keefe and Hossein Pournajafi‐Nazarloo. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Biological Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, Translational Psychiatry and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.