Saskia Baert

801 citations
9 papers · 646 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Saskia Baert

9 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

Saskia Baert
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 437
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 57
  • Clinical Psychology 207
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 195
  • Applied Psychology 22
Replace Michael Weightman with:
Michael Weightman Australia
Jesse T. Kaye United States
Yefei Wang China
László Mayer Hungary
Bettina Gathmann Germany
Annchen R. Knodt United States
Manuela Sellitto Italy
Danielle L. Taylor United States
José Raúl Naranjo Germany
Gwladys Rey Switzerland
Saskia Baert relative to Michael Weightman Australia Michael Weightman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Michael Weightman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Saskia Baert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Saskia Baert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saskia Baert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saskia Baert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Saskia Baert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saskia Baert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saskia Baert. The network helps show where Saskia Baert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Saskia Baert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Saskia Baert Line = papers co-authored together Saskia Baert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2006251
2 2010161
3 201155
4 201050
5 201138
6 200935
7 202022
8 201120
9 201314

About Saskia Baert

Saskia Baert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Connexins and lens biology (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (437 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (57 citations), Clinical Psychology (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (195 citations) and Applied Psychology (22 citations). Saskia Baert has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Rudi De Raedt, Ernst H. W. Koster, Ellen Goeleven, Rik Schacht, Anne Speckens, Adriaan Visser, Joël R. van Aalderen, Erik E. L. Jansen, Ineke Demeyer and An Raes. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Therapy and Research, Anxiety Stress & Coping, Haematologica, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact