Sarira El‐Den

64 papers receiving 970 citations

Peers

Sarira El‐Den
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 73
  • Family Practice 24
  • Clinical Psychology 217
  • Social Psychology 172
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 96
Replace Anilkrishna B. Thota with:
Anilkrishna B. Thota United States
Caroline Carney Doebbeling United States
Corine Latour Netherlands
Kurt B. Angstman United States
Martina Summer Meranius Sweden
Senaida Fernandez United States
Kerstin Blomqvist Sweden
Fadwa Alhalaiqa Jordan
Margareta Troein Sweden
Sahdia Parveen United Kingdom
Sarira El‐Den relative to Anilkrishna B. Thota United States Anilkrishna B. Thota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Anilkrishna B. Thota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarira El‐Den

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarira El‐Den's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarira El‐Den with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarira El‐Den more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarira El‐Den

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarira El‐Den. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarira El‐Den. The network helps show where Sarira El‐Den may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarira El‐Den, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarira El‐Den Line = papers co-authored together Sarira El‐Den links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017142
2 201976
3 201861
4 201560
5 201856
6 202055
7 202155
8 202037
9 202133
10 202231
11 202129
12 202027
13 201923
14 201921
15 202216
16 202215
17 202114
18 202214
19 202312
20 202212

About Sarira El‐Den

Sarira El‐Den is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 72 papers that have together received 997 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (4 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (73 citations), Family Practice (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (217 citations), Social Psychology (172 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (96 citations). Sarira El‐Den has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Claire L. O’Reilly, Timothy F. Chen, Rebekah Moles, Stephen Carter, Jack C. Collins, Sara S. McMillan, Amanda Wheeler, Andrea Murphy, Carl R. Schneider and Luis Salvador‐Carulla. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, BMJ Open and International Journal of Social Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact