Lorraine Smith

136 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Lorraine Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Family Practice 140
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 219
  • Health Informatics 43
  • Physiology 741
  • Applied Psychology 115
Replace Maria Panagioti with:
Maria Panagioti United Kingdom
Tim Usherwood Australia
Roland Grad Canada
César de Oliveira United Kingdom
Giancarlo Lucchetti Brazil
Brian K. Ahmedani United States
Peter Knapp United Kingdom
Michael L. Berbaum United States
Brian Hurwitz United Kingdom
Jane Phillips Australia
Lorraine Smith relative to Maria Panagioti United Kingdom Maria Panagioti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Maria Panagioti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lorraine Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorraine Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorraine Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorraine Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorraine Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorraine Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorraine Smith. The network helps show where Lorraine Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lorraine Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lorraine Smith Line = papers co-authored together Lorraine Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007228
2 2015193
3 2014186
4 2017181
5 2014118
6 2009103
7 200294
8 201291
9 201087
10 201777
11 201976
12 201173
13 200769
14 201566
15 201764
16 201763
17 201162
18 201657
19 201157
20 201156

About Lorraine Smith

Lorraine Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Education, having authored 142 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (20 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (11 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (6 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (140 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (219 citations), Health Informatics (43 citations), Physiology (741 citations) and Applied Psychology (115 citations). Lorraine Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sinthia Bosnic‐Anticevich, Ines Krass, Helen K. Reddel, Bandana Saini, Carol Armour, Susan M. Sawyer, Louise Locock, Juliet M. Foster, Stephen Goodall and Tania Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of Asthma, Patient Education and Counseling, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy and Chronic Illness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact