Sarah Thomas

100 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Sarah Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Virology 332
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 215
  • Physiology 273
  • Biological Psychiatry 104
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 247
Replace Richard Lathe with:
Richard Lathe United Kingdom
Wolfgang Fischer United States
Dominique Aunis France
Stéfano Marullo France
Michael R. Ruff United States
Jean E. Merrill United States
Beth J. Hoffman United States
Eliseo A. Eugenín United States
Karen E. Anderson United Kingdom
Tajie H. Harris United States
Sarah Thomas relative to Richard Lathe United Kingdom Richard Lathe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Richard Lathe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Thomas. The network helps show where Sarah Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009178
2 2004173
3 2011131
4 1999109
5 199898
6 200581
7 200477
8 200768
9
Blood-brain barrier permeability and bioavailability of a highly potent and mu-selective opioid receptor antagonist, CTAP: comparison with morphine.
199768
10 199667
11 201066
12 201362
13 199858
14 199755
15 200255
16 200954
17 198653
18 200852
19 200350
20 201946

About Sarah Thomas

Sarah Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 104 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (14 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (13 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (11 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (10 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (10 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (332 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (215 citations), Physiology (273 citations), Biological Psychiatry (104 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (247 citations). Sarah Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lavanya Varatharajan, Thomas P. Davis, Julie Gibbs, Carmine M. Pariante, Victor J. Hruby, Malcolm B. Segal, M. B. Segal, Annmarie Surprenant, Lisa Sanderson and Robert Kerwin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Brain Research, Journal of Neurochemistry, PLoS ONE and The Journal of General Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact