Sarah Beake

1.9k citations
39 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Beake

39 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Sarah Beake
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 634
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 504
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 337
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 556
  • Epidemiology 578
Replace Elaine Burns with:
Elaine Burns Australia
Rhona J. McInnes United Kingdom
Janice Butt Australia
Amy Balbierz United States
Mary Anne Biró Australia
Kristina Edvardsson Australia
Jane Taylor Australia
Helen Stapleton Australia
Rada K. Dagher United States
Felicia McCormick United Kingdom
Sarah Beake relative to Elaine Burns Australia Elaine Burns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Elaine Burns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Beake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Beake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Beake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Beake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Beake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Beake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Beake. The network helps show where Sarah Beake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Beake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Beake Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Beake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010273
2 2007259
3 200793
4 201174
5 201457
6 201052
7 201945
8 201644
9 199941
10 201338
11 201737
12 200734
13 200628
14 202225
15 201425
16 200922
17 202122
18 201121
19
Women's views of hospital and community-based postnatal care: the good, the bad and the indifferent
200521
20 201219

About Sarah Beake

Sarah Beake is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (20 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (18 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (12 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (634 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (504 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (337 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (556 citations) and Epidemiology (578 citations). Sarah Beake has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Christine McCourt, Debra Bick, Virginia Schmied, Fiona Dykes, Athena Sheehan, Jenny Gamble, Jane Weaver, Debra Creedy, Helen Statham and Yan‐Shing Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, Maternal and Child Nutrition, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Birth and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact