Sarah Mitchell

487 citations
6 papers · 194 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Mitchell

5 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Sarah Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 53
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 82
  • Developmental Neuroscience 18
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 8
  • Physiology 60
Replace Aenea Hendry with:
Aenea Hendry United Kingdom
Klára Matesz Hungary
Alessandra Cifra Italy
Katarina Ilić Croatia
Anna D. Zych United States
C. William Shuttleworth United States
Yalun Tan United States
T. E. Bridges Australia
Andrew D. Nelson United States
Nilla Sivakumar United States
Sarah Mitchell relative to Aenea Hendry United Kingdom Aenea Hendry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Aenea Hendry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Mitchell. The network helps show where Sarah Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Electromyographic activity of intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the human tongue.
197595
2 201748
3 201731
4 201714
5 20236
6 20250

About Sarah Mitchell

Sarah Mitchell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper), Chemokine receptors and signaling (1 paper), Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (1 paper), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Immune cells in cancer (1 paper) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (53 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (82 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (18 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (8 citations) and Physiology (60 citations). Sarah Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Eberhardt K. Sauerland, Alex L. Kolodkin, Matthew Brown, Mark N. Wu, Masashi Tabuchi, Qianwen Zhu, Ingie Hong, Shu‐Ling Chiu, Qiang Wang and Richard L. Huganir. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Neuron, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cancer Research and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact