Sarah Eitze

40 papers receiving 968 citations

Sarah Eitze's Hit Papers

Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition 2020 · 224 citations
2240+2+4Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Sarah Eitze
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Health 316
  • Modeling and Simulation 109
  • Communication 109
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 256
Replace Lisa Felgendreff with:
Lisa Felgendreff Germany
Philipp Sprengholz Germany
Katrine Bach Habersaat Denmark
Frederik Juhl Jørgensen Denmark
Michael Becher United States
Lauren Dayton United States
Rachel Faulkenberry McCloud United States
Kristin Lunz Trujillo United States
Valérie Seror France
Jennifer A. Lueck United States
Sarah Eitze relative to Lisa Felgendreff Germany Lisa Felgendreff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Lisa Felgendreff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Eitze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Eitze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Eitze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Eitze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Eitze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Eitze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Eitze. The network helps show where Sarah Eitze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Eitze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Eitze Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Eitze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition
Hit paper breakdown →
2020224
2 2020211
3 202086
4 201952
5 202151
6 202134
7 202229
8 201827
9 202126
10 201825
11 202123
12 202122
13 202121
14 202117
15 202116
16 202115
17 202213
18 202111
19 202111
20 202110

About Sarah Eitze

Sarah Eitze is a scholar working on Health, Communication, Modeling and Simulation, Sociology and Political Science and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 999 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (19 papers), COVID-19 Prevention and Impact (11 papers), Communication and COVID-19 Impact (8 papers), Risk Perception and Management (6 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (2 papers) and COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (316 citations), Modeling and Simulation (109 citations), Communication (109 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (256 citations). Sarah Eitze has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Cornelia Betsch, Lars Korn, Philipp Sprengholz, Lisa Felgendreff, Philipp Schmid, ROBERT M. BOHM, Lothar H. Wieler, Dorothee K. Heinemeier, Michael Bošnjak and Volker Stollorz. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Health Psychology, PLoS ONE, Journal of Medical Ethics and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact