Stephan Voß

858 citations
24 papers · 374 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephan Voß

19 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Stephan Voß
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Modeling and Simulation 92
  • Clinical Psychology 127
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 53
  • Speech and Hearing 26
Replace Erika B. Fulmer with:
Erika B. Fulmer United States
Sumarni Mohd Ghazali Malaysia
Keitly Mensah France
Katharina Wabnitz Germany
Moawiah Khatatbeh Jordan
Shahram Saeidi Iran
Madhumita Dobe India
Claudia Marcela Vélez Colombia
Aparajita Dasgupta India
Alireza Zangeneh Iran
Stephan Voß relative to Erika B. Fulmer United States Erika B. Fulmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Erika B. Fulmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Voß

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Voß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Voß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Voß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Voß

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Voß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Voß. The network helps show where Stephan Voß may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephan Voß, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephan Voß Line = papers co-authored together Stephan Voß links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202071
2 202067
3 202149
4 202143
5 202140
6 202121
7 202113
8 202112
9 202110
10 202310
11 20239
12 20247
13 20246
14 20226
15 20243
16 20223
17 20222
18 20241
19 20251
20 20240

About Stephan Voß

Stephan Voß is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Modeling and Simulation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Community Health and Development (4 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (92 citations), Clinical Psychology (127 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (53 citations) and Speech and Hearing (26 citations). Stephan Voß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michaela Coenen, Ani Movsisyan, Eva Rehfuess, Caroline Jung‐Sievers, Jacob Burns, Jan M Stratil, Karin Geffert, Kerstin Sell, Lisa M. Pfadenhauer and Katharina Wabnitz. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMJ Open and Frontiers in Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact