Sarah E. Williams

84 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Sarah E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 846
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 325
  • Social Psychology 773
  • Applied Psychology 175
  • Health 227
Replace Joey C. Eisenmann with:
Joey C. Eisenmann United States
Barbara A. Morrongiello Canada
Eric E. Hall United States
Adilson Marques Portugal
John B. Bartholomew United States
Richard Rowe United Kingdom
Jordan Smith Australia
Charles J. Hardy United States
J.P. Maxwell Hong Kong
Margaret Schneider United States
Sarah E. Williams relative to Joey C. Eisenmann United States Joey C. Eisenmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Joey C. Eisenmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Williams. The network helps show where Sarah E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012180
2 2014124
3 2011110
4 2021108
5 201395
6 201080
7 197179
8 201377
9 201568
10 201368
11 200467
12 201566
13 201764
14 199761
15 201159
16 201656
17 201344
18 200943
19 201142
20 201942

About Sarah E. Williams

Sarah E. Williams is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport Psychology and Performance (31 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (23 papers), Sports Performance and Training (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (846 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (325 citations), Social Psychology (773 citations), Applied Psychology (175 citations) and Health (227 citations). Sarah E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Cumming, Jet Veldhuijzen Zanten, Annie T. Ginty, Sam J. Cooley, Laura J. Wright, Richard Ramsey, C. I. Mayfield, Mary L. Quinton, Sanna M. Nordin‐Bates and Craig Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Anxiety Stress & Coping, International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology and European Journal of Sport Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact