Sarah E. Vordenberg

49 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Vordenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 48
  • Family Practice 14
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Physiology 49
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 3
Replace Nicole S Culhane with:
Nicole S Culhane United States
Kelly L. Scolaro United States
Abdullah T Khoja Saudi Arabia
Jessica Fraeyman Belgium
Rafaella de Oliveira Santos Silva Brazil
Avantika Saraf Shah United States
Lyda Blom Netherlands
Yuankai Huang China
Justine Tomlinson United Kingdom
Bruno Chicoulaa France
Sarah E. Vordenberg relative to Nicole S Culhane United States Nicole S Culhane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Nicole S Culhane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Vordenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Vordenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Vordenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Vordenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Vordenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Vordenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Vordenberg. The network helps show where Sarah E. Vordenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Vordenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Vordenberg Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Vordenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202134
2 201928
3 202019
4 202215
5 202215
6 202313
7 202010
8 20239
9 20199
10 20249
11 20208
12 20238
13 20217
14 20187
15 20237
16 20217
17 20187
18 20246
19 20236
20 20226

About Sarah E. Vordenberg

Sarah E. Vordenberg is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Family Practice, having authored 53 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (48 citations), Family Practice (14 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Physiology (49 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (3 citations). Sarah E. Vordenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher, Kristie Rebecca Weir, Lisa M. Holle, Vivienne Mak, Vincent D. Marshall, Aaron M. Scherer, Kristin C. Klein, Jesse Jansen, Paul C. Walker and Nancy L. Schoenborn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, JAMA, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact