Sarah E. Steane

599 citations
29 papers · 458 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah E. Steane

26 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Steane
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 139
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 199
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 73
  • Nephrology 28
  • Sensory Systems 17
Replace A. M. Pascual-Leone with:
A. M. Pascual-Leone Spain
Elena Loche United Kingdom
Jessica R. Ivy United Kingdom
Christina Vohlen Germany
Andrée‐Anne Lacasse Canada
Limor Besser Israel
A. Gairard France
Natalia Lazzarin Italy
Roland James United States
Stephanie M. Kereliuk Canada
Sarah E. Steane relative to A. M. Pascual-Leone Spain A. M. Pascual-Leone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×59×
A. M. Pascual-Leone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Steane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Steane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Steane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Steane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Steane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Steane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Steane. The network helps show where Sarah E. Steane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Steane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Steane Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Steane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201758
2 200448
3 200942
4 200435
5 201932
6 201728
7 201924
8 201423
9 200721
10 202119
11 201515
12 200515
13 202115
14 202114
15 202312
16 200612
17 202311
18 20229
19 20208
20 20226

About Sarah E. Steane

Sarah E. Steane is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology and Rheumatology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (13 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (11 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (8 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (4 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers), Magnesium in Health and Disease (3 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (139 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (199 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (73 citations), Nephrology (28 citations) and Sensory Systems (17 citations). Sarah E. Steane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karen M. Moritz, Paul A. Dawson, Daniel Markovich, James Cuffe, Marie Pantaleon, Lisa K. Akison, Kathryn McMahon, Mary Elizabeth Pownall, Laura Faas and Harry V. Isaacs. Their work appears in journals such as Placenta, The Journal of Physiology, Behavioural Brain Research, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact