Danielle J. Borg

1.3k citations
40 papers · 994 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle J. Borg

38 papers receiving 981 citations

Peers

Danielle J. Borg
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Clinical Biochemistry 173
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 240
  • Nephrology 88
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 74
  • Surgery 293
Replace Bogna Wierusz‐Wysocka with:
Bogna Wierusz‐Wysocka Poland
Stella Tran Canada
Stephen M. Thomas United Kingdom
Koka Motoyama Japan
Eman Abdel Rahman Ismail Egypt
Małgorzata Szelachowska Poland
Csaba Bereczki Hungary
Martin Press United Kingdom
Shirley Nakhla Australia
Danielle J. Borg relative to Bogna Wierusz‐Wysocka Poland Bogna Wierusz‐Wysocka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Bogna Wierusz‐Wysocka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle J. Borg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle J. Borg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle J. Borg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle J. Borg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle J. Borg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle J. Borg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle J. Borg. The network helps show where Danielle J. Borg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle J. Borg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle J. Borg Line = papers co-authored together Danielle J. Borg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014208
2 2016128
3 201378
4 202266
5 201657
6 201143
7 201641
8 201741
9 201037
10 201426
11 202425
12 202123
13 201623
14 201722
15 202221
16 202120
17 202216
18 201614
19 201512
20 202311

About Danielle J. Borg

Danielle J. Borg is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Glycation End Products research (11 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (10 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (8 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (7 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (4 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (173 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (240 citations), Nephrology (88 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (74 citations) and Surgery (293 citations). Danielle J. Borg has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Josephine M. Forbes, Linda A. Gallo, Ezio Bonifacio, Amelia K. Fotheringham, Domenica A. McCarthy, Sumaira Z. Hasnain, Brooke E. Harcourt, Aowen Zhuang, Michael A. McGuckin and Ran Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Placenta, Diabetologia, Nutrients, Scientific Reports and Current Diabetes Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact