Sarah E. Hill

75 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Sarah E. Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 901
  • Applied Psychology 242
  • Marketing 428
  • General Decision Sciences 64
  • Social Psychology 653
Replace Theresa E. Robertson with:
Theresa E. Robertson United States
Eva Walther Germany
Lawrence S. Sugiyama United States
Timothy Ketelaar United States
Megan Oaten Australia
Debra Mashek United States
Jennifer E. Stellar United States
Helen Fisher United States
Geoff MacDonald Canada
Lauri A. Jensen‐Campbell United States
Sarah E. Hill relative to Theresa E. Robertson United States Theresa E. Robertson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Theresa E. Robertson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Hill. The network helps show where Sarah E. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Hill Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010195
2 2018172
3 2012164
4 2011120
5 201693
6 200685
7 201285
8 201179
9
The Evolution of Self-Esteem.
201377
10 201274
11 200868
12 201064
13 202052
14 201949
15 201345
16 201240
17 200537
18 200437
19 201636
20 201535

About Sarah E. Hill

Sarah E. Hill is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (43 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (10 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (901 citations), Applied Psychology (242 citations), Marketing (428 citations), General Decision Sciences (64 citations) and Social Psychology (653 citations). Sarah E. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David M. Buss, Kristina M. Durante, Danielle J. DelPriore, Christopher D. Rodeheffer, Vladas Griskevicius, Marjorie L. Prokosch, Joshua M. Ackerman, Damian R. Murray, Charles G. Lord and Phillip W. Vaughan. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Evolutionary Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact