Eva Walther

87 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Eva Walther
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • General Decision Sciences 225
  • Applied Psychology 515
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 791
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 430
Replace Cindy Harmon‐Jones with:
Cindy Harmon‐Jones Australia
Theresa E. Robertson United States
Steven J. Stroessner United States
Johannes Keller Germany
Roland Neumann Germany
Hans IJzerman Netherlands
Aiden P. Gregg United Kingdom
Yoav Bar‐Anan Israel
Ran R. Hassin Israel
Thomas Krämer United States
Eva Walther relative to Cindy Harmon‐Jones Australia Cindy Harmon‐Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cindy Harmon‐Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Walther

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Walther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Walther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Walther more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Walther

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Walther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Walther. The network helps show where Eva Walther may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Walther, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Walther Line = papers co-authored together Eva Walther links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004273
2 2002185
3 2002181
4 2005141
5 2005111
6 2018109
7 201896
8 200284
9 200274
10 200674
11 200874
12 200873
13 201269
14 200768
15 199967
16 199655
17 200446
18 200345
19 199937
20 200336

About Eva Walther

Eva Walther is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (40 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (25 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (18 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (11 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (8 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (225 citations), Applied Psychology (515 citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (791 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (430 citations). Eva Walther has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bertram Gawronski, Benjamin Buttlar, Klaus Fiedler, Benjamin Nagengast, Nira Liberman, Tal Eyal, Hartmut Blank, Yaacov Trope, Georg Halbeisen and Stefanie Nickel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Cognition & Emotion, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Appetite and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact