Sarah Brook
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Ecology top 10%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Marine animal studies overview
Papers in
- Ecology 7
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 5
- Crustacean biology and ecology 1
- Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies 1
- Marine animal studies overview 1
-
- Primate Behavior and Ecology 3
- Co-authors
- Matthew Scott Luskin (1 shared paper)Madhu Rao (1 shared paper)Brett R. Scheffers (1 shared paper)Rachakonda Sreekar (1 shared paper)Hannah O’Kelly (1 shared paper)Rhett D. Harrison (1 shared paper)Nandini Velho (1 shared paper)Jedediah F. Brodie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (2 papers)Conservation Biology (1 paper)Conservation Letters (1 paper)Acta Oecologica (1 paper)Animal Conservation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sarah Brook
7 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Ecological Modeling 81
- Ecology 270
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 94
- Global and Planetary Change 69
- Developmental Biology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Brook
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Brook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Brook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Brook. The network helps show where Sarah Brook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 |
About Sarah Brook
Sarah Brook is a scholar working on Ecology, Social Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Molecular Biology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Crustacean biology and ecology (1 paper), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (1 paper) and Marine animal studies overview (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (81 citations), Ecology (270 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (94 citations), Global and Planetary Change (69 citations) and Developmental Biology (7 citations). Sarah Brook has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Scott Luskin, Madhu Rao, Brett R. Scheffers, Rachakonda Sreekar, Hannah O’Kelly, Rhett D. Harrison, Nandini Velho, Jedediah F. Brodie, Simon P. Mahood and Gert Polet. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Conservation Biology, Conservation Letters, Acta Oecologica and Animal Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.