Sara Stanner

83 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Sara Stanner
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 539
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 519
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 175
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 657
  • Animal Science and Zoology 234
Replace Hellas Cena with:
Hellas Cena Italy
Kellie Casavale United States
Ann M. Ferris United States
Ana Baylín United States
Celine Murrin Ireland
Lesley MacDonald‐Wicks Australia
Chizuru Nishida Switzerland
Mauro E. Valencia Mexico
Douglas S. Lewis United States
Ambika Satija United States
Sara Stanner relative to Hellas Cena Italy Hellas Cena's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Hellas Cena · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Stanner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Stanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Stanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Stanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Stanner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Stanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Stanner. The network helps show where Sara Stanner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Stanner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Stanner Line = papers co-authored together Sara Stanner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997399
2 2011200
3 2005160
4 2011138
5 2001127
6 2013102
7 201182
8 200178
9 200161
10 201652
11 201347
12 201944
13 201041
14
Cardiovascular disease : diet, nutrition and emerging risk factors : the report of a British Nutrition Foundation task force
200539
15 200437
16 201536
17 201936
18 201535
19 202034
20 200331

About Sara Stanner

Sara Stanner is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Genetics, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (37 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (24 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (15 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (13 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (12 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (8 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (7 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (539 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (519 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (175 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (657 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (234 citations). Sara Stanner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John Yudkin, L. Wyness, A. Spiro, Judy Buttriss, S. Lockyer, E. Weichselbaum, Christian Andrés, K. Bulmer, R. Foster and GM Leung. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition Bulletin, British Journal Of Nutrition, Nutrition Reviews, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics and Proceedings of The Nutrition Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact