Sara Joice
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Papers in
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 13
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 2
- Co-authors
- Jacqui Morris (8 shared papers)Marie Johnston (6 shared papers)Ronald S. MacWalter (3 shared papers)Frederike van Wijck (2 shared papers)Clare L. Scott (2 shared papers)Magdalena Ietswaart (2 shared papers)H. Chris Dijkerman (2 shared papers)Marie Donaghy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Disability and Rehabilitation (5 papers)BMC Neurology (2 papers)Journal of Psychosomatic Research (1 paper)Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Sara Joice
19 papers receiving 939 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Rehabilitation 516
- Cognitive Neuroscience 167
- Conservation 27
- Neurology 95
- Psychiatry and Mental health 92
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Joice
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Joice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Joice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Joice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Joice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Joice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Joice. The network helps show where Sara Joice may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Joice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 247 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 160 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 152 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 88 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 82 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 62 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 1 |
About Sara Joice
Sara Joice is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pharmacology, Conservation, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 19 papers that have together received 992 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (13 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (2 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (1 paper), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper), Workplace Health and Well-being (1 paper), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (516 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (167 citations), Conservation (27 citations), Neurology (95 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (92 citations). Sara Joice has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jacqui Morris, Marie Johnston, Ronald S. MacWalter, Frederike van Wijck, Clare L. Scott, Magdalena Ietswaart, H. Chris Dijkerman, Marie Donaghy, Steven Hamilton and Thilo Kroll. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, BMC Neurology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Trials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.