Sara de Wit

611 citations
14 papers · 326 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Sara de Wit

14 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Sara de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Global and Planetary Change 155
  • Sociology and Political Science 144
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 62
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 33
  • Ecological Modeling 11
Replace Ian M. Picketts with:
Ian M. Picketts Canada
Tiago Capela Lourenço Portugal
Emmanuel Tolulope Busayo South Africa
Paula Williams United States
Fahim Tonmoy Australia
Emmanuel M. Luna Philippines
Julie Dekens Nepal
Richenda Connell United Kingdom
Tania López-Marrero Puerto Rico
Enora Bruley France
Sara de Wit relative to Ian M. Picketts Canada Ian M. Picketts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ian M. Picketts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara de Wit. The network helps show where Sara de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Sara de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2019111
2 201362
3 202057
4 202122
5 202120
6 202114
7 201811
8 20188
9 20246
10 20245
11 20214
12 20153
13
Political dimensions of climate change adaption: Conceptual reflections and African examples = Dimensions politiques de l'adaptation au changement climatique
20132
14
Global Warning. An ethnography of the encounter between global and local climate-change discourses in the Bamenda Grassfields, Cameroon
20151

About Sara de Wit

Sara de Wit is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 14 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (3 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (3 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (2 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (155 citations), Sociology and Political Science (144 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (62 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (33 citations) and Ecological Modeling (11 citations). Sara de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kerry Bowman, Lisa Dilling, Farid Ahmad, Zinta Zommers, Anjal Prakash, Johanna Nalau, Émile Chappin, Christian Bogmans, Gerard P.J. Dijkema and Todd Schenk. Their work appears in journals such as Climatic Change, BMJ Global Health, Nature Climate Change, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change and npj Clean Water.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact