Sara Day

468 citations
31 papers · 289 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 6
    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology 6
    • Reproductive System and Pregnancy 3
    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction 3

Sara Day

27 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Sara Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Hepatology 30
  • Infectious Diseases 66
  • Immunology 66
  • Microbiology 19
  • Virology 13
Replace Manjeetha Jaggernath with:
Manjeetha Jaggernath United States
Mireille Prince‐David Togo
Lydie Béniguel France
Juan Camilo Sánchez‐Arcila Brazil
B. Osborne Canada
C-A Siegrist Switzerland
Kerina Duri Zimbabwe
Hyppolite K. Tchidjou Italy
Collins Odhiambo Kenya
Montse Renom Mozambique
Sara Day relative to Manjeetha Jaggernath United States Manjeetha Jaggernath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Manjeetha Jaggernath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Day. The network helps show where Sara Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Day Line = papers co-authored together Sara Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201352
2
Serum hypophosphatemia in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate recipients is multifactorial in origin, questioning the utility of its monitoring in clinical practice.
200532
3 200624
4 201023
5 200023
6 199320
7 201317
8 200016
9 201014
10 202112
11 20048
12 20207
13 20057
14 20205
15 20154
16 20023
17 20213
18 20023
19 19923
20 20243

About Sara Day

Sara Day is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers) and Reproductive tract infections research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (30 citations), Infectious Diseases (66 citations), Immunology (66 citations), Microbiology (19 citations) and Virology (13 citations). Sara Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Kenya and Finland. Frequent co-authors include O.N. Donkor, Todor Vasiljevic, S. Smith, Rabia Ashraf, P.P.J. Dunn, Martin Fisher, G. Cavanagh, Matthew Hankins, Heather Leake Date and Sophie Jones. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of STD & AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections, Journal of Medical Internet Research, International Journal of Immunogenetics and HIV Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact