Sara Cleto

1.3k citations
14 papers · 987 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 6
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 4
    • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects 2
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 2
    • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 3

Sara Cleto

14 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

Sara Cleto
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Microbiology 90
  • Endocrinology 60
  • Ecology 287
  • Biotechnology 92
  • Business and International Management 21
Replace Carlotta Ronda with:
Carlotta Ronda United States
Charles H. Haitjema United States
Jacob A. Englaender United States
Mee‐Jung Han South Korea
М. Р. Шарипова Russia
José M. Andrade Portugal
Anna Kristina Witte Austria
Maarten Mols Netherlands
Weiquan Wang China
Alexander S. Solonin Russia
Sara Cleto relative to Carlotta Ronda United States Carlotta Ronda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Carlotta Ronda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Cleto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Cleto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Cleto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Cleto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Cleto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Cleto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Cleto. The network helps show where Sara Cleto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Cleto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Cleto Line = papers co-authored together Sara Cleto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2016309
2 2016202
3 2016105
4 201271
5 201667
6 200763
7 201251
8 200745
9 200742
10 202111
11 20147
12 20177
13 20224
14
Corynebacterium glutamicum Metabolic Engineering with CRISPR Interference (CRISPRi)
20163

About Sara Cleto

Sara Cleto is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Organic Chemistry, Ecology and Biotechnology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 987 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (2 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (90 citations), Endocrinology (60 citations), Ecology (287 citations), Biotechnology (92 citations) and Business and International Management (21 citations). Sara Cleto has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Timothy K. Lu, Diana P. Pires, Sanna Sillankorva, Joana Azeredo, M. J. Vieira, Volker F. Wendisch, Pablo Pérez‐Piñera, Maria Olívia Pereira, Manuel Simões and Barbara Jusiak. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Water Science & Technology, Applied Categorical Structures, BMC Biology and Foods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact