Sandy Hogg
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 1%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 3
-
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior 5
- Co-authors
- Sandra E. File (5 shared papers)C.A. Marsden (1 shared paper)Luis E. Gonzalez (1 shared paper)Nick Andrews (1 shared paper)D. J. Sanger (3 shared papers)Paul Moser (3 shared papers)Ashutosh Dalvi (1 shared paper)M Jessa (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (6 papers)Behavioural Brain Research (2 papers)Neuropharmacology (1 paper)Toxicology (1 paper)Journal of Neurotrauma (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceDenmark
In The Last Decade
Sandy Hogg
14 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Sandy Hogg's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Behavioral Neuroscience 420
- Biological Psychiatry 133
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 597
- Social Psychology 398
- Cognitive Neuroscience 285
Countries citing papers authored by Sandy Hogg
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandy Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandy Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandy Hogg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sandy Hogg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandy Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandy Hogg. The network helps show where Sandy Hogg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Sandy Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A review of the validity and variability of the Elevated Plus-Maze as an animal model of anxiety Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 953 |
| 2 | 1994 | 128 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 108 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 35 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 34 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 8 |
About Sandy Hogg
Sandy Hogg is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Small Animals and Neurology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (420 citations), Biological Psychiatry (133 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (597 citations), Social Psychology (398 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (285 citations). Sandy Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Sandra E. File, C.A. Marsden, Luis E. Gonzalez, Nick Andrews, D. J. Sanger, Paul Moser, Ashutosh Dalvi, M Jessa, P.S. Mabbutt and Emma Fluck. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Behavioural Brain Research, Neuropharmacology, Toxicology and Journal of Neurotrauma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.