Sandrine Eimer

26 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

Sandrine Eimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Genetics 185
  • Biological Psychiatry 37
  • Neurology 138
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 139
  • Biophysics 40
Replace Nicole Parker with:
Nicole Parker Australia
Shuai Wu China
Ján Remšík United States
Yonggao Mou China
Candice C. Poon Canada
T.K. Yeung United Kingdom
Y. Watson United Kingdom
Rajiv Magge United States
Walter Rachinger Germany
Yasuhiko Akiyama Japan
Sandrine Eimer relative to Nicole Parker Australia Nicole Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Nicole Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandrine Eimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandrine Eimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandrine Eimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandrine Eimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandrine Eimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandrine Eimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandrine Eimer. The network helps show where Sandrine Eimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandrine Eimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandrine Eimer Line = papers co-authored together Sandrine Eimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014118
2 200969
3 201168
4 201568
5 201957
6 201152
7 201244
8 201238
9 201926
10 200725
11 201024
12 202023
13 201119
14 201517
15 200616
16 201313
17 201511
18 200611
19 200711
20 201310

About Sandrine Eimer

Sandrine Eimer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Neurology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (2 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (185 citations), Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Neurology (138 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (139 citations) and Biophysics (40 citations). Sandrine Eimer has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hugues Loiseau, Marc‐Antoine Belaud‐Rotureau, Anne Vital, Franck Couillaud, Bruno Quesson, Chrit Moonen, Josette Arsaut, Roel Deckers, Françis Belloc and Clovis Adam. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Endocrine Connections and Acta Neuropathologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact