Sandra P. Thomas

4.4k citations
162 papers · 3.1k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Sandra P. Thomas

153 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Sandra P. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Research and Theory 104
  • Clinical Psychology 991
  • Health 228
  • Social Psychology 601
  • General Health Professions 615
Replace Bonnie M. Hagerty with:
Bonnie M. Hagerty United States
John Coverdale United States
Roberta Fida Italy
Dianne Wynaden Australia
Terence V. McCann Australia
Karin Dahlberg Sweden
Agnès Higgins Ireland
Lynn Rew United States
John R. Cutcliffe United Kingdom
Pamela A. Ratner Canada
Sandra P. Thomas relative to Bonnie M. Hagerty United States Bonnie M. Hagerty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bonnie M. Hagerty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra P. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra P. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra P. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra P. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra P. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra P. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra P. Thomas. The network helps show where Sandra P. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra P. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra P. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Sandra P. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 162 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007152
2 2008117
3 2010111
4 2002103
5 2005100
6 200095
7 200494
8 199988
9 200586
10 199279
11 199977
12 200475
13 201374
14 200872
15
Women and Anger
199371
16 198966
17 200657
18 201756
19 199752
20 200351

About Sandra P. Thomas

Sandra P. Thomas is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 162 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (18 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (11 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (7 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (7 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (104 citations), Clinical Psychology (991 citations), Health (228 citations), Social Psychology (601 citations) and General Health Professions (615 citations). Sandra P. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mona Shattell, Patricia Droppleman, Torsten J. Gerpott, Renee Burk, Sharon S. Starr, Mitzi Davis, Mary E. Johnson, Janet Secrest, Joanne M. Hall and Helen Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Nursing Research, Health Care For Women International, Nursing Forum, Issues in Mental Health Nursing and MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact