Issues in Mental Health Nursing

3.1k papers and 45.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 45.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.6k papers), General Health Professions (1.1k papers) and Social Psychology (718 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (385 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (261 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (238 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Issues in Mental Health Nursing are Brenda Happell, Michelle Cleary, Jacquelyn H. Flaskerud, Faye Gary, Jana C. Saunders, Elizabeth Reeves, Jan Horsfall, Mona Shattell, Susan A. Bonis and Lora Humphrey Beebe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Issues in Mental Health Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025