Sandra Mott

438 citations
30 papers · 315 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Sandra Mott

27 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Sandra Mott
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 29
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 92
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Research and Theory 2
  • Clinical Psychology 46
Replace Mamak Tahmasebi with:
Mamak Tahmasebi Iran
Elaine Zwelling United States
Irene Hurst United States
Karin Jackson Sweden
Sarah Rhoads United States
Nadin M. Abdel Razeq Jordan
Erin Paquette United States
Alejandra Barrero‐Castillero United States
Merryl Harvey United Kingdom
Stephanie Kukora United States
Sandra Mott relative to Mamak Tahmasebi Iran Mamak Tahmasebi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Mamak Tahmasebi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Mott. The network helps show where Sandra Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Mott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Mott Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Mott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201089
2 201135
3 201229
4 201526
5 202022
6 202115
7 201712
8 20169
9 20049
10 20119
11 20167
12
Nursing care of children and families
19857
13 20216
14 20135
15 19775
16 20174
17
Nursing care of children and families : a holistic approach
19854
18 20104
19 19893
20 20143

About Sandra Mott

Sandra Mott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Epidemiology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 30 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (29 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (92 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations) and Clinical Psychology (46 citations). Sandra Mott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Indonesia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nancy E. Kline, Kathy J. Jenkins, Sion Kim Harris, Patricia A. Hickey, Monica E. Kleinman, Richard D. Goldstein, Deirdre E. Logan, Navil F. Sethna, Jean A. Connor and Monica Adhiambo Onyango. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Nursing, Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, Applied Nursing Research, Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact