Sandra Hing

24 papers receiving 934 citations

Peers

Sandra Hing
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 142
  • Genetics 207
  • Hematology 79
  • Oncology 180
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 209
Replace Pierre Heimann with:
Pierre Heimann Belgium
Jennifer Willert United States
Christian Herens Belgium
Marion C. Baker United Kingdom
Rosamma DeCastro United States
Carol Berger United States
Annet Simons Netherlands
Robert B. Jenkins United States
Sheila Sait United States
Susan Chilton‐MacNeill Canada
Sandra Hing relative to Pierre Heimann Belgium Pierre Heimann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Pierre Heimann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Hing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Hing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Hing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Hing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Hing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Hing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Hing. The network helps show where Sandra Hing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Hing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Hing Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Hing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013211
2 2001111
3 200783
4 200978
5 199058
6 198754
7 201253
8 200252
9 201142
10 200441
11 201436
12 198825
13 200324
14 200924
15 198717
16 198812
17 198612
18 200712
19 200510
20 19896

About Sandra Hing

Sandra Hing is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (4 papers), Renal and related cancers (3 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers) and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (142 citations), Genetics (207 citations), Hematology (79 citations), Oncology (180 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (209 citations). Sandra Hing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kathy Pritchard‐Jones, Yong‐Jie Lu, Janet Shipley, Paul O’Donnell, Adrienne M. Flanagan, David Delaney, Richard D. Williams, Paul E. Grundy, Roberto Tirabosco and Gudrun E. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Annals of Human Genetics, Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, Modern Pathology and British Journal of Haematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact