Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology

28.5k citations
1.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology

1.1k papers receiving 18.2k citations

Peers

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Occupational Therapy 7.2k
  • Rehabilitation 3.8k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 1.1k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 2.3k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 3.8k
Replace International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics with:
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics United States
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal Australia
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy Canada
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research United States
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Sweden
Rehabilitation Psychology United States
Disability & Society United Kingdom
The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development United States
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation United Kingdom
Neurorehabilitation United States
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology relative to International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics United States International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology.

About Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology

The 1.9k papers published in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology in the last decades have received a total of 28.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology usually cover Occupational Therapy (502 papers), Rehabilitation (157 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (41 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (174 papers) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (45 papers) specifically the topics of Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (473 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (160 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (157 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (131 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (78 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (55 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (51 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology are Tom Chau, Elaine Biddiss, William C. Miller, François Routhier, Keshini Madara Marasinghe, Marcia J. Scherer, Dorcas Beaton, Luc de Witte, Rory A. Cooper and Johan Borg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact