Samson Amos

2.5k citations
65 papers · 2.0k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 9
    • Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species 7
    • Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies 4

Samson Amos

65 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Samson Amos
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Pharmacology 334
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 271
  • Food Science 376
  • Cancer Research 273
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 269
Replace Paolo Scartezzini with:
Paolo Scartezzini Italy
Yong Nam Han South Korea
Jamal Mahajna Israel
Jin‐Bin Wu Taiwan
Hiroshige Hibasami Japan
Yutaka Miura Japan
Guan-Jhong Huang Taiwan
Subodh Kumar India
Hasan Safayhi Germany
Samson Amos relative to Paolo Scartezzini Italy Paolo Scartezzini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Paolo Scartezzini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samson Amos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samson Amos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samson Amos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samson Amos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samson Amos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samson Amos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samson Amos. The network helps show where Samson Amos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Samson Amos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samson Amos Line = papers co-authored together Samson Amos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010196
2 2001118
3 2003105
4 200495
5 200194
6 200392
7 200778
8 200277
9 200665
10 200155
11 200755
12 200850
13 201847
14 200947
15 200445
16 201040
17 200338
18 200236
19 200735
20 200535

About Samson Amos

Samson Amos is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (9 papers), Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species (7 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (4 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (4 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (4 papers) and Biological and pharmacological studies of plants (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (334 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (271 citations), Food Science (376 citations), Cancer Research (273 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (269 citations). Samson Amos has collaborated with scholars based in Nigeria, United States and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include K. Gamaniel, Charles Wambebe, Bulus Adzu, L. Binda, Isa M. Hussaini, Ben A. Chindo, Benjamin Purow, Louis Comeau, Elizabeth A. Montgomery and Patrick Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Phytotherapy Research, Fitoterapia, Pharmaceutical Biology and Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact