Sam Woolford

11 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Sam Woolford
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Marketing 17
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 46
  • Pharmacy 7
  • Family Practice 3
Replace Natalie King with:
Natalie King United Kingdom
Dena Goldberg United States
Siqi Liu China
John E. Schneider United States
Tonya Schneidereith United States
Michael Haight United States
Lynne Doner Lotenberg United States
Martine Bouman Netherlands
Pernille Bertelsen Denmark
Ferry Fadzlul Rahman Indonesia
Sam Woolford relative to Natalie King United Kingdom Natalie King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Natalie King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Woolford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Woolford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Woolford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Woolford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Woolford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Woolford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Woolford. The network helps show where Sam Woolford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Sam Woolford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sam Woolford Line = papers co-authored together Sam Woolford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2009100
2 200784
3 201430
4 200821
5 202111
6 20168
7 20078
8
The Adoption of Genomic-Related Innovations by Family Physicians
20146
9 20103
10 20093
11
Enrolment Management in Graduate Business Programs: Predicting Student Retention
20111

About Sam Woolford

Sam Woolford is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Media Technology, Genetics, Communication and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 11 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper), Error Correcting Code Techniques (1 paper), Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper), AI and HR Technologies (1 paper) and Quality and Supply Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (18 citations), Marketing (17 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (46 citations), Pharmacy (7 citations) and Family Practice (3 citations). Sam Woolford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Dominique Haughton, Colleen M. McBride, Elaine Puleo, Kathryn I. Pollak, Karen M. Emmons, Elizabeth C. Clipp, Vence L. Bonham, Sherrill L. Sellers, Abdolreza Eshghi and Nandini Hadker. Their work appears in journals such as The American Statistician, BMC Health Services Research, Social Science & Medicine, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management and Haemophilia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact