International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management

7.1k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management

1.1k papers receiving 6.5k citations

Peers

International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Management Information Systems 3.3k
  • Strategy and Management 3.2k
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 175
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.4k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1.1k
Replace Gestão & Produção with:
Gestão & Produção Brazil
Engineering Management Journal United States
Production Brazil
Enterprise Information Systems China
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries United States
International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering India
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology South Africa
International Journal of Services and Operations Management India
Construction Innovation United Kingdom
Facilities United Kingdom
International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management relative to Gestão & Produção Brazil Gestão & Produção's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Gestão & Produção · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management.

About International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management

The 1.3k papers published in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management usually cover Management Information Systems (536 papers), Strategy and Management (411 papers), Medical Laboratory Technology (30 papers), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (193 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (119 papers) specifically the topics of Quality and Supply Management (497 papers), Quality and Management Systems (199 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (104 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (78 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (72 papers), Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (68 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (64 papers) and Quality Function Deployment in Product Design (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management are Andrea Chiarini, Inderpreet Singh Ahuja, Arash Shahin, Darshak A. Desai, Richard A. Reid, D.R. Prajapati, S.S. Mahapatra, Gouher Ahmed, Mohammed Sadique Khan and Suresh Garg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact