Natalie King

31 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Natalie King
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 35
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 6
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 22
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 5
  • Physiology 11
Replace Tonya Schneidereith with:
Tonya Schneidereith United States
Austin S. Kilaru United States
Helen Barrie Australia
Zhengyuan Wang China
Susanne Voelter‐Mahlknecht Germany
Stephen P. Fitzgerald Australia
Li Deng China
Jiali Li China
Mariana P. Socal United States
David L. Driscoll United States
Natalie King relative to Tonya Schneidereith United States Tonya Schneidereith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Tonya Schneidereith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie King. The network helps show where Natalie King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie King Line = papers co-authored together Natalie King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201461
2 202246
3 199744
4 201841
5 202131
6 200024
7 200921
8 202219
9 202217
10 202117
11 202116
12 201715
13 202212
14 200812
15 202211
16 20189
17 20216
18 20216
19 20195
20 20225

About Natalie King

Natalie King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers), Cruise Tourism Development and Management (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (35 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (6 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (22 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (5 citations) and Physiology (11 citations). Natalie King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vik­neswaran Nair, Uma Thevi Munikrishnan, Judy Wright, Stephen J. Hill, John M. Dickenson, Stephen Touyz, Margaret Charles, Farag Shuweihdi, С. Николова and Daniel Howdon. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making and Ageing Research Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact