Sam Haidar

2.4k citations
21 papers · 990 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sam Haidar

20 papers receiving 956 citations

Peers

Sam Haidar
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Statistics and Probability 242
  • Pharmaceutical Science 148
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 208
  • Transplantation 27
  • Pharmacology 74
Replace L J Lesko with:
L J Lesko United States
MO Karlsson Sweden
Marylore Chenel France
Nam Atiqur Rahman United States
Kevin Krudys United States
Barbara M. Davit United States
Ta C. Wu United States
Vijay Batra United States
Sheila Annie Peters Germany
Chandrahas Sahajwalla United States
Sam Haidar relative to L J Lesko United States L J Lesko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
L J Lesko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Haidar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Haidar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Haidar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Haidar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Haidar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Haidar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Haidar. The network helps show where Sam Haidar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sam Haidar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sam Haidar Line = papers co-authored together Sam Haidar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009230
2 2007145
3 200894
4 201288
5 201487
6 200873
7 199568
8 201553
9 199726
10 201024
11 200222
12 200019
13 199618
14 201215
15 199713
16 20087
17 20194
18 20232
19 20121
20 20161

About Sam Haidar

Sam Haidar is a scholar working on Immunology, Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (8 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (242 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (148 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (208 citations), Transplantation (27 citations) and Pharmacology (74 citations). Sam Haidar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence X. Yu, Barbara M. Davit, Dale P. Conner, Patrick E. Nwakama, Donald J. Schuirmann, Fairouz Makhlouf, Yongsheng Yang, Janet Woodcock, Mei‐Ling Chen and Robert Lionberger. Their work appears in journals such as The AAPS Journal, Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Research, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact