S. Schmidt

66 papers receiving 813 citations

Peers

S. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Radiation 182
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 253
  • Condensed Matter Physics 213
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 358
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 148
Replace M. Chapellier with:
M. Chapellier France
J. Feikes Germany
G. C. Baldwin United States
H. Gabriel Germany
A. Masaike Japan
Christoph Bostedt United States
G. De Ninno Italy
Marek Wieland Germany
Agostino Marinelli United States
S. Bhattacharya India
S. Schmidt relative to M. Chapellier France M. Chapellier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
M. Chapellier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Schmidt. The network helps show where S. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together S. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201371
2 200156
3 201850
4 202143
5 201842
6 198932
7 201831
8 200031
9 201630
10 198930
11 201229
12 201621
13 200021
14 199819
15 199917
16 202215
17 201815
18 199814
19
The TRAPSENSOR facility: an open-ring 7 tesla Penning trap for laser-based precision experiments
201913
20 200012

About S. Schmidt

S. Schmidt is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Radiation and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 67 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (20 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (12 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (12 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (182 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (253 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (213 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (358 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (148 citations). S. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. Lüthi, B. Wolf, S. Zherlitsyn, H. Schwenk, W. Nörtershäuser, I. Kouroudis, H. Schmidt‐Böcking, S. Hagmann, R. E. Olson and C. Kelbch. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, Physical Review Letters, Europhysics Letters (EPL), Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact