Christopher Geppert

884 citations
31 papers · 457 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Geppert

28 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Christopher Geppert
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Radiation 87
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 244
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 101
  • Spectroscopy 87
  • Biotechnology 37
Replace K. Wendt with:
K. Wendt Germany
G. Miloshevsky United States
T. Achtzehn Canada
J. R. Patterson Australia
P. Alexa Czechia
A. L. Harkness United States
F. M. Quinn United Kingdom
Xiao-Jing Liu China
Gergely Németh Hungary
U. Brinkmann Germany
Christopher Geppert relative to K. Wendt Germany K. Wendt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
K. Wendt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Geppert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Geppert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Geppert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Geppert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Geppert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Geppert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Geppert. The network helps show where Christopher Geppert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Geppert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Geppert Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Geppert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200564
2 201442
3 201842
4 200830
5 200328
6 199625
7 200422
8 200421
9 200919
10 200618
11 201517
12 201517
13 201313
14 201911
15 200311
16 200811
17 200211
18 201010
19 20219
20 20028

About Christopher Geppert

Christopher Geppert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Ecology and Radiation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (3 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (3 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (3 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (87 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (244 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (101 citations), Spectroscopy (87 citations) and Biotechnology (37 citations). Christopher Geppert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include W. Nörtershäuser, K. Wendt, Heinz C. Schröder, R. Horn, K. Wendt, Wernér E.G. Müller, Matthias Wiens, Andreas Reiber, P. Bricault and R. Sánchez. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact