Ch. Geppert

2.5k citations
70 papers · 2.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Ch. Geppert

68 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Ch. Geppert
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.6k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 585
  • Spectroscopy 152
  • Aerospace Engineering 209
  • Radiation 63
Replace H.‐J. Kluge with:
H.‐J. Kluge Germany
P. Egelhof Germany
M. D. Seliverstov Russia
K. T. Flanagan United Kingdom
R. Klapisch France
P. Campbell United Kingdom
R. Kirchner Germany
M. Huýse Belgium
M. L. Bissell Belgium
Fritz Buchinger Canada
Ch. Geppert relative to H.‐J. Kluge Germany H.‐J. Kluge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
H.‐J. Kluge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ch. Geppert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ch. Geppert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ch. Geppert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ch. Geppert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ch. Geppert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ch. Geppert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ch. Geppert. The network helps show where Ch. Geppert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ch. Geppert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ch. Geppert Line = papers co-authored together Ch. Geppert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009220
2 2009141
3 2010140
4 2012108
5 201389
6 201078
7 201277
8 201073
9 201870
10 200554
11 199848
12 200646
13 200145
14 201240
15 200536
16 200636
17 201236
18 201634
19 201634
20 201033

About Ch. Geppert

Ch. Geppert is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Spectroscopy and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (37 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (22 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (15 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (7 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (4 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.6k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (585 citations), Spectroscopy (152 citations), Aerospace Engineering (209 citations) and Radiation (63 citations). Ch. Geppert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include W. Nörtershäuser, Klaus Blaum, Jörg Krämer, R. Neugart, A. Krieger, D. T. Yordanov, M. L. Bissell, K. Wendt, Rodolfo Sanchez and P. Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review C, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics and Physics Letters B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact