S. Mark Pancer

84 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

S. Mark Pancer
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Safety Research 549
  • Health 433
  • Social Psychology 1.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 870
  • Applied Psychology 165
Replace Mary J. Heppner with:
Mary J. Heppner United States
Çiğdem Kâğıtçıbaşı Türkiye
Isaac Prilleltensky United States
Carol K. Sigelman United States
Rivka Tuval‐Mashiach Israel
Ofra Mayseless Israel
Sam A. Hardy United States
Carolyn McNamara Barry United States
Michael D. Berzonsky United States
David H. Demo United States
S. Mark Pancer relative to Mary J. Heppner United States Mary J. Heppner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Mary J. Heppner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Mark Pancer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Mark Pancer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Mark Pancer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Mark Pancer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Mark Pancer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Mark Pancer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Mark Pancer. The network helps show where S. Mark Pancer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Mark Pancer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Mark Pancer Line = papers co-authored together S. Mark Pancer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007276
2 2000201
3 2007184
4 2000180
5 2003125
6 200096
7 201493
8 200091
9 199691
10 200090
11 200583
12 200080
13 201075
14 201174
15 200172
16 200572
17 199972
18
Facilitating the Transition to University: Evaluation of a Social Support Discussion Intervention Program.
200067
19 200858
20 200258

About S. Mark Pancer

S. Mark Pancer is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 85 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Health and Development (14 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (13 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (8 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (549 citations), Health (433 citations), Social Psychology (1.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (870 citations) and Applied Psychology (165 citations). S. Mark Pancer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Pratt, Bruce Hunsberger, Susan Alisat, Shelly Birnie-Lefcovitch, Maxine Gallander Wintre, Gerald R. Adams, Janet Polivy, Lynne M. Jackson, Steven D. Brown and Qi Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Research, Political Psychology, Journal of Personality, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Journal of Family Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact