Ryan Best

17 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Ryan Best
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • General Decision Sciences 69
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 39
  • Applied Psychology 53
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 107
  • Family Practice 17
Replace Emily Chan with:
Emily Chan United States
Elena Bessarabova United States
Anastassiya Kovaleva Luxembourg
Jonathan C. Corbin United States
Katherine S. Corker United States
Catherine D. Rawn Canada
Tara A. Rench United States
Dennis John Germany
Ben J. Searle Australia
Mary Anne Lahey United States
Ryan Best relative to Emily Chan United States Emily Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.9×
Emily Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ryan Best

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan Best more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan Best

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan Best. The network helps show where Ryan Best may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ryan Best, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ryan Best Line = papers co-authored together Ryan Best links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2010286
2 201579
3 202328
4 201423
5 201622
6 201619
7 199513
8 202111
9 201510
10 20129
11 20189
12 20225
13 20214
14 20173
15 20201
16
Dutch Nurses’ Willingness to Use Home Telehealth
20141
17
Effect of Age on Discounting of Technology-Related Learning
20111
18 20220
19 20250

About Ryan Best

Ryan Best is a scholar working on Demography, General Health Professions, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (69 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (39 citations), Applied Psychology (53 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (107 citations) and Family Practice (17 citations). Ryan Best has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Mark C. Fox, K. Anders Ericsson, Neil Charness, Alexandra M. Freund, Dustin J. Souders, JoNell Strough, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Thijs van Houwelingen, H.S.M. Kort and Walter R. Boot. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Aging, Gerontology, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact