Rutherford Mc

997 citations
11 papers · 786 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Rutherford Mc

11 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers

Rutherford Mc
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 231
  • Global and Planetary Change 157
  • Forestry 25
  • Ecology 144
  • Plant Science 190
Replace Rogério Both with:
Rogério Both Germany
Eduardo Dias Forneck Brazil
J. J. Midgley South Africa
Linda Olsvig‐Whittaker Israel
Mária Höhn Hungary
R. F. Parsons Australia
Mario R. Fariñas Venezuela
Pablo José Francisco Pena Rodrigues Brazil
Marcelo D. Barrera Argentina
Michele Ataroff Venezuela
Rutherford Mc relative to Rogério Both Germany Rogério Both's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rogério Both · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rutherford Mc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rutherford Mc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rutherford Mc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rutherford Mc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rutherford Mc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rutherford Mc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rutherford Mc. The network helps show where Rutherford Mc may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rutherford Mc, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rutherford Mc Line = papers co-authored together Rutherford Mc links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005396
2
Vegetation Atlas of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland
200784
3
Succulent Karoo Biome
200670
4 200344
5
Indian Ocean Coastal Belt
200638
6
Aboveground biomass subdivisions in woody species of the savanna ecosystem project study area, Nylsvley
197935
7
Albany Thicket Biome
200630
8
Nama Karoo Biome
200630
9
Coastal Vegetation of South Africa
200629
10 201219
11
Ecosystem Status and Protection Level of Vegetation Types
200611

About Rutherford Mc

Rutherford Mc is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Forestry, Ecology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 11 papers that have together received 786 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Plant Ecology and Soil Science (2 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (1 paper), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (1 paper) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (231 citations), Global and Planetary Change (157 citations), Forestry (25 citations), Ecology (144 citations) and Plant Science (190 citations). Rutherford Mc has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Spain and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Ladislav Mucina, Éric Garnier, Guy Franklin Midgley, Marie‐Laure Navas, Sandra M. Díaz, John Hodgson, Francisco Lloret, Denis Vile, Catherine Roumet and Ian J. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Botany, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, African Journal of Range and Forage Science, Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling and eSpace (Curtin University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact