Ian J. Wright
Impact in
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.01%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecological Modeling top 0.1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 94
- Forest ecology and management 27
-
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 89
- Co-authors
- Mark Westoby (44 shared papers)Peter B. Reich (41 shared papers)Daniel S. Falster (16 shared papers)Ülo Niinemets (21 shared papers)Hendrik Poorter (11 shared papers)David I. Warton (5 shared papers)Angela T. Moles (4 shared papers)Rafael Villar (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- New Phytologist (28 papers)Functional Ecology (16 papers)Global Ecology and Biogeography (10 papers)Annals of Botany (8 papers)Journal of Ecology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ian J. Wright
186 papers receiving 30.1k citations
Ian J. Wright's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 16.6k
- Ecological Modeling 2.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 12.4k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 9.3k
- Plant Science 11.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Ian J. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian J. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian J. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian J. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian J. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian J. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian J. Wright. The network helps show where Ian J. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian J. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 190 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 2472 |
| 2 | Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 2292 |
| 3 | Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta‐analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 2244 |
| 4 | Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1933 |
| 5 | The Evolution of Plant Functional Variation: Traits, Spectra, and Strategies Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1146 |
| 6 | A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 857 |
| 7 | Functional traits and the growth–mortality trade‐off in tropical trees Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 824 |
| 8 | The evolutionary ecology of seed size. Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 812 |
| 9 | Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 801 |
| 10 | Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 747 |
| 11 | Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 735 |
| 12 | Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high‐ and low‐rainfall and high‐ and low‐nutrient habitats Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 728 |
| 13 | Global climatic drivers of leaf size Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 685 |
| 14 | ARE FUNCTIONAL TRAITS GOOD PREDICTORS OF DEMOGRAPHIC RATES? EVIDENCE FROM FIVE NEOTROPICAL FORESTS Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 616 |
| 15 | Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 515 |
| 16 | 2006 | 446 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 412 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 391 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 368 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 358 |
About Ian J. Wright
Ian J. Wright is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 190 papers that have together received 30.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (94 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (89 papers), Plant and animal studies (33 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (27 papers), Forest ecology and management (27 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers), Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (13 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (16.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (12.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (9.3k citations) and Plant Science (11.1k citations). Ian J. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Westoby, Peter B. Reich, Daniel S. Falster, Ülo Niinemets, Hendrik Poorter, David I. Warton, Angela T. Moles, Rafael Villar, Jacek Oleksyn and Lourens Poorter. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Functional Ecology, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Annals of Botany and Journal of Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.