Ruth Walker
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health top 2%
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 11
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 4
- Co-authors
- Mary A. Luszcz (18 shared papers)Janet E. Hiller (2 shared papers)Julie Ratcliffe (16 shared papers)Claire Hutchinson (12 shared papers)Chris Wilkinson (3 shared papers)Deborah Turnbull (2 shared papers)Emily Lancsar (4 shared papers)Xanthe Golenko (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal on Ageing (5 papers)Ageing and Society (3 papers)Journal of Aging & Social Policy (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Health & Social Care in the Community (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruth Walker
73 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 71
- Health 242
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 106
- Demography 157
- Clinical Psychology 178
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Walker. The network helps show where Ruth Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 130 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 84 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 23 |
About Ruth Walker
Ruth Walker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Demography, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (11 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (71 citations), Health (242 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (106 citations), Demography (157 citations) and Clinical Psychology (178 citations). Ruth Walker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mary A. Luszcz, Janet E. Hiller, Julie Ratcliffe, Claire Hutchinson, Chris Wilkinson, Deborah Turnbull, Emily Lancsar, Xanthe Golenko, Christiane A. Hoppmann and Jennifer A. Whitty. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal on Ageing, Ageing and Society, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, PLoS ONE and Health & Social Care in the Community.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.