Ruth Taylor

46 papers receiving 942 citations

Peers

Ruth Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Research and Theory 49
  • Accounting 131
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
  • Clinical Psychology 193
  • General Health Professions 200
Replace Sophia F. Dziegielewski with:
Sophia F. Dziegielewski United States
Karen Hill United States
Linda Burke United Kingdom
Barbara J. Daley United States
Michael Clinton United Kingdom
Robin Bartlett United States
Franziska Trede Australia
Allan B. de Guzman Philippines
Andrew N. Garman United States
François Courcy Canada
Ruth Taylor relative to Sophia F. Dziegielewski United States Sophia F. Dziegielewski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sophia F. Dziegielewski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Taylor. The network helps show where Ruth Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975276
2 2020114
3 200476
4 202075
5 202062
6 201353
7 202042
8 201733
9 201931
10 200521
11 201519
12 201218
13 201617
14 201417
15 201514
16 201513
17 201112
18 201512
19 201211
20 201211

About Ruth Taylor

Ruth Taylor is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (49 citations), Accounting (131 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (193 citations) and General Health Professions (200 citations). Ruth Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anne Hofmeyer, Kate Kennedy, Colin Macduff, Luisa Toffoli, Hester C. Klopper, Dorrie K. Fontaine, Siedine K. Coetzee, Lesley Baillie, Sheelagh Martindale and Adele Laing. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Nurse Education in Practice and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact