Ruth Stanton
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 2%
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Complementary and Manual Therapy top 10%
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
- Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies 1
- Psychological Treatments and Assessments 1
-
- Health and Wellbeing Research 1
- Co-authors
- Roslyn Corney (4 shared papers)H. G. Morgan (3 shared papers)Robert Newell (2 shared papers)Peter D. Fairclough (1 shared paper)Anthony W. Clare (1 shared paper)A. W. Clare (1 shared paper)Christine Johnson (2 shared papers)Jonathan Evans (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (3 papers)Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (1 paper)Psychiatric Bulletin (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ruth Stanton
7 papers receiving 318 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Gastroenterology 166
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 11
- Complementary and alternative medicine 34
- Pharmacy 17
- Clinical Psychology 76
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Stanton
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Stanton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Stanton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Stanton. The network helps show where Ruth Stanton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 146 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 5 |
About Ruth Stanton
Ruth Stanton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gastroenterology and Pharmacology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Menstrual Health and Disorders (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (1 paper), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (1 paper), Workplace Violence and Bullying (1 paper) and Health and Wellbeing Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (166 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (11 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (34 citations), Pharmacy (17 citations) and Clinical Psychology (76 citations). Ruth Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roslyn Corney, H. G. Morgan, Robert Newell, Peter D. Fairclough, Anthony W. Clare, A. W. Clare, Christine Johnson and Jonathan Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Psychiatric Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.