Ruth Payne
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
-
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Papers in
-
- Malaria Research and Control 4
- Ethics in Clinical Research 2
-
- Children's Rights and Participation 4
- Youth Education and Societal Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Simon J. Draper (5 shared papers)Paul Griffin (1 shared paper)Stephen Bell (1 shared paper)James McCarthy (1 shared paper)Hans de Graaf (2 shared papers)Navin Venkatraman (1 shared paper)Lynda Coughlan (1 shared paper)Matthew Edmans (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Children s Geographies (3 papers)Malaria Journal (2 papers)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1 paper)Educational Review (1 paper)Cell Reports Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Ruth Payne
19 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Safety Research 69
- Infectious Diseases 69
- Sociology and Political Science 164
- Virology 16
- Clinical Psychology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Payne
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Payne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Payne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Payne. The network helps show where Ruth Payne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 103 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Ruth Payne
Ruth Payne is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Malaria Research and Control (4 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (4 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (1 paper) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (69 citations), Infectious Diseases (69 citations), Sociology and Political Science (164 citations), Virology (16 citations) and Clinical Psychology (70 citations). Ruth Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Simon J. Draper, Paul Griffin, Stephen Bell, James McCarthy, Hans de Graaf, Navin Venkatraman, Lynda Coughlan, Matthew Edmans, Saranya Sridhar and Alison M. Lawrie. Their work appears in journals such as Children s Geographies, Malaria Journal, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Educational Review and Cell Reports Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.