Ruth E. Sherman

2.5k citations
44 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth E. Sherman

44 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ruth E. Sherman
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 626
  • Soil Science 445
  • Ecology 1.1k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 191
  • Ecological Modeling 117
Replace Beth A. Middleton with:
Beth A. Middleton United States
Elise S. Gornish United States
Jean‐Michel Gobat Switzerland
Patricia Moreno‐Casasola Mexico
Suzanne Kercher United States
J.P. Bakker Netherlands
Rudy van Diggelen Netherlands
Bruce D. Clarkson New Zealand
Ab P. Grootjans Netherlands
Miguel Angel Ayarza Colombia
Ruth E. Sherman relative to Beth A. Middleton United States Beth A. Middleton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Beth A. Middleton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Sherman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Sherman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Sherman. The network helps show where Ruth E. Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Sherman Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Sherman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003159
2 1998143
3 2000140
4 201598
5 200183
6 200182
7 200480
8 201377
9 201375
10 200775
11 201573
12 200869
13 201569
14 198963
15 201163
16 201160
17 201454
18 201453
19 201452
20 201341

About Ruth E. Sherman

Ruth E. Sherman is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (15 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (12 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (6 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (6 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (6 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (626 citations), Soil Science (445 citations), Ecology (1.1k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (191 citations) and Ecological Modeling (117 citations). Ruth E. Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Fahey, Pedro Martı́nez, Patrick H. Martin, Joseph B. Yavitt, Shikui Dong, Peter M. Groffman, John J. Battles, Robert W. Howarth, John C. Maerz and Melany C. Fisk. Their work appears in journals such as Biotropica, Biogeochemistry, Water Air & Soil Pollution, Ecosystems and The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact