Countries where authors publish in Biogeochemistry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biogeochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biogeochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biogeochemistry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biogeochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biogeochemistry.
About Biogeochemistry
The 3.4k papers published in Biogeochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 222.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Biogeochemistry usually cover Environmental Chemistry (1.5k papers), Soil Science (1.1k papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (458 papers), Ecology (1.5k papers) and Oceanography (677 papers) specifically the topics of Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (1.2k papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (1.0k papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (805 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (624 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (339 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (339 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (324 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (260 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biogeochemistry are Robert Warren Howarth, William H. Schlesinger, Cory C. Cleveland, Peter M. Vitousek, JM Oades, Daniel Liptzin, Charles T. Driscoll, Eric A. Davidson, Kate Lajtha and Cindy E. Prescott.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.