Xiaokun Ou

62 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

Xiaokun Ou
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 248
  • Ecological Modeling 79
  • Global and Planetary Change 288
  • Ecology 223
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 103
Replace Ulrich Stachow with:
Ulrich Stachow Germany
R. Arthur Chapman South Africa
Yoseph Araya United Kingdom
Mark T. Simmons United States
Veronika Fontana Italy
Jan Vlok South Africa
Alejandro Miranda Chile
Greg G. Forsyth South Africa
Riho Marja Hungary
W. Geertsema Netherlands
Xiaokun Ou relative to Ulrich Stachow Germany Ulrich Stachow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ulrich Stachow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaokun Ou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaokun Ou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaokun Ou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaokun Ou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaokun Ou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaokun Ou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaokun Ou. The network helps show where Xiaokun Ou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaokun Ou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaokun Ou Line = papers co-authored together Xiaokun Ou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013107
2 201377
3 200576
4 201774
5 201948
6 200940
7 201730
8 201225
9 201324
10 202023
11 201122
12 201622
13 201421
14 201821
15 200920
16 201919
17 201719
18 201718
19 201316
20 202116

About Xiaokun Ou

Xiaokun Ou is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 63 papers that have together received 932 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers), Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China (9 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (8 papers), Remote Sensing and Land Use (7 papers), Environmental Changes in China (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (248 citations), Ecological Modeling (79 citations), Global and Planetary Change (288 citations), Ecology (223 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (103 citations). Xiaokun Ou has collaborated with scholars based in China, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zhiming Zhang, Robert De Wulf, Daming He, Wenling Wang, Thomas Hennig, Yan Feng, Jan Salick, Robert K. Moseley, Luc Hens and Sailesh Ranjitkar. Their work appears in journals such as Mountain Research and Development, Land Degradation and Development, Alpine Botany, Plant Diversity and Forests.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact