Ruth E. Bennett
Impact in
- Horticulture top 5%
- Forestry top 10%
- Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Amanda D. Rodewald (8 shared papers)T. Scott Sillett (4 shared papers)Miguel Ignacio Gomez (4 shared papers)Robert A. Rice (3 shared papers)Peter P. Marra (2 shared papers)Kenneth V. Rosenberg (3 shared papers)Ximena Rueda (2 shared papers)Harold Mathijs van Es (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (2 papers)Avian Conservation and Ecology (1 paper)The Auk (1 paper)Agribusiness (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Ruth E. Bennett
21 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Horticulture 14
- Forestry 25
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48
- Ecology 122
- Strategy and Management 54
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Bennett
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Bennett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Bennett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Bennett. The network helps show where Ruth E. Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 1 |
About Ruth E. Bennett
Ruth E. Bennett is a scholar working on Ecology, Forestry, Strategy and Management, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Plant Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (12 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies (1 paper) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (14 citations), Forestry (25 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (48 citations), Ecology (122 citations) and Strategy and Management (54 citations). Ruth E. Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Amanda D. Rodewald, T. Scott Sillett, Miguel Ignacio Gomez, Robert A. Rice, Peter P. Marra, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, Ximena Rueda, Harold Mathijs van Es, Thomas Brandt Ryder and Nicholas J. Bayly. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Avian Conservation and Ecology, The Auk, The Auk and Agribusiness.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.